The appeals being led by Walz, Obama, and white dudes for Harris all use the same rhetoric; one of guilt and shame--something our political class in media, academia, and government have been doing with its policies and rhetoric for decades. They see men merely as vehicles for political advantage and not people who deserve dignity, fairness, and equality. In order for men to truly fit in, at least in the eyes of the media, it seems males have to subjugate themselves at the altar of a particular rhetoric that leans left and can never lean right.
The messaging, in a bizarre way, debases the independence of men and women who care about boys and men--like beggars fighting for scraps on the outskirts of a feast, the messengers believe men are lucky to even smell the feast.
Men are not the only demographic with whom democrats are having a problem; it's also women who want families and women with families. There are some 80 million family households in America and 58 million are married couple households. There are single moms out their with sons who desperately want their sons to do well and see how the deck is stacked against them. And if you're the middle-class or poorer mother of a son, you're really seeing the charade being rolled out. You already know that your son is the second sex in their eyes.
Thanks for your comment. I agree, the messaging could be way better. ..."the messengers believe men are lucky to even smell the feast." Lol that's funny, I hear what you are saying. It's like there is so little attention being paid to men, that any attention, even poorly executed, is better than nothing. What's the Eddie Murphy line? When you haven't eaten food in a long time, and you get a cracker, you say, "This isn't just a cracker, it's a Ritz!!!"
The appeals being led by Walz, Obama, and white dudes for Harris all use the same rhetoric; one of guilt and shame--something our political class in media, academia, and government have been doing with its policies and rhetoric for decades. They see men merely as vehicles for political advantage and not people who deserve dignity, fairness, and equality. In order for men to truly fit in, at least in the eyes of the media, it seems males have to subjugate themselves at the altar of a particular rhetoric that leans left and can never lean right.
The messaging, in a bizarre way, debases the independence of men and women who care about boys and men--like beggars fighting for scraps on the outskirts of a feast, the messengers believe men are lucky to even smell the feast.
Men are not the only demographic with whom democrats are having a problem; it's also women who want families and women with families. There are some 80 million family households in America and 58 million are married couple households. There are single moms out their with sons who desperately want their sons to do well and see how the deck is stacked against them. And if you're the middle-class or poorer mother of a son, you're really seeing the charade being rolled out. You already know that your son is the second sex in their eyes.
Thanks for your comment. I agree, the messaging could be way better. ..."the messengers believe men are lucky to even smell the feast." Lol that's funny, I hear what you are saying. It's like there is so little attention being paid to men, that any attention, even poorly executed, is better than nothing. What's the Eddie Murphy line? When you haven't eaten food in a long time, and you get a cracker, you say, "This isn't just a cracker, it's a Ritz!!!"